My Hackergotchi

Updated: Never — Philip's Blog

Now featuring regular updates!

Sun, 24 May 2009

12:49 – Forbidden efficiency

I'm running a bit behind on the news again. One advantage of reading a week's worth of newspapers in a day however, is that stories develop much quicker than if you have to wait a whole day for the next episode. A disadvantage is that idiocy becomes much clearer and gets the blood boiling much quicker too.

Next month, like everyone else in Europe, we'll be voting for our representatives in the European parliament. In Belgium, we will also be voting for representatives in the superfluous "regional" parliaments.

Elections are compulsory in Belgium. This is a good thing as it allows politicians to campaign on facts (should they so choose) rather than having to expend a lot of energy on motivating the uninterested to vote. A parliament voted only by fanatics would be a very bad thing of course. A couple of weeks before the elections, every eligible voter gets a summons in the mail from their local council telling them where they need to go to vote.

Some towns in Belgium have very mixed populations. Much to the dismay of certain right-wing linguistic supremacists, there are people speaking Dutch, French, Arabic, English, Turkish and other languages all living together in the same town. How very untidy! One such town near Brussels decided to be practical and send out the elections summons in Dutch and French. This is much more efficient of course than writing it in Dutch and adding a footnote that anyone needing a French translation can request one specially.

"Gosh, it's a letter from the government, three weeks before elections, could this be my summons? I don't know, we should request a translation to be sure!".

Of course, this got the extremists very upset. And the newspapers have exploded again with cries about "wasting money" and such. Only in the fictional region of "Flanders" do we have politicians who seriously believe that forbidding efficiency can save them money.

What can possibly be gained by emphatically deciding not to write to your inhabitants in a language they understand? Do they think it will motivate people to "integrate" (nasty word) better? If anything, I think it would make people feel more left out.

Forbidding efficiency. What a stupid idea.

I think it's obvious that I'm not going to vote for anyone promoting such lunacy.

Grump.

When I first moved to Wales, I got a very nice leaflet from the UK government. It informed of certain rights and let me know some basics like who could vote, how to pay for TV tax, where to find a doctor and some other tidbits that newcomers might find useful. This leaflet was sent to me in over a dozen languages. Including Dutch, Arabic and Chinese. In said country, people take this as a token of good will, and find it rather useful that they are able to understand the mail they get.

In this country, it's indeed the case that efficiency is discouraged. Maybe this sort of linguistic protectionism was useful at some point in some dusty past (I doubt it, but one never knows), but it's certainly ridiculous in this 21st century. I would very much like to vote for a party that's willing to get rid of this ridiculous crap, but it seems like there is no such thing.

Posted by Bram at Sun May 24 13:10:41 2009
I congratulate you on your effort to provide a completely one-sided and extremely shallow view of a complex situation. While I may agree with you on some points, this blog post is just a purely idiotic waste of bits.
Try twittering haikus instead perhaps. You'd be able to capture the same amount of opinionated disinformation and fling the same insulting slurs in 140 characters, but at least we'd be able to admire the compactness and poetic form.

Posted by Zombie at Sun May 24 14:53:47 2009
Sadly, 140 characters is never enough for a good rant. :-)
The point of a blog is rather to provide a "one-sided" view of things.  The author's view.  I am aware that it's a very complex situation.  Breaking it up into easy to digest bits which annoy me helps me bend my mind around it.  Makes the elimination game somewhat easier too.

I will have to waste many more bits to fill the shiny new disks in the machine hosting my shallow one-sided views of things.  Sorry about that. :-o

Posted by Philip Paeps at Sun May 24 16:37:47 2009
Zombie is missing the point completely.

Philip doesn't rant because he feels so strongly about the issue. I think that he couldn't care less for a country that just happens to contain his postal address.
I think that he blogs about it just because he likes to be controversial. That way he gets more comments, more traffic, ???, profit! (and I'm not saying that this is a bad thing)

;-)

Posted by Amedee at Fri May 29 23:13:31 2009
Amedee: my country is Europe and I care quite a lot about it.

Posted by Philip Paeps at Fri May 29 23:37:41 2009
I would've expected a reply more along the lines of "the world is my oyster"...

Posted by Bram at Sun May 31 18:05:03 2009

Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:


Prove that you are not a spammer: